2. Articole
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/50
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item ADVERBELE CU SEMELE DE [+PASIVITATE] ŞI [+RECIPROCITATE] CU VALENŢĂ SUBIECTIV-OBIECTIVĂ(CEP USM, 2007) Lifari, VioricaThe adverb is the part of speech that can render the meaning of voice. These are as a rule those words that are formed from verbs via adjectives. The semantics of these words as introductory ones is of special interest as they give the utterance a particular content in which the author expresses his/her idea about what is being said. The adverbs denote the meanings of the passive, reciprocal and reflexive voices. The adverbs denoting reciprocal meaning are bivalent on both levels, semantic and syntactic, in comparison with those that render passivity and do not have their subjective valency expressed syntactically.Sometimes the two meanings of voice passive and reciprocal overlap. Alongside the meaning of voice the adverb expresses the meaning of modality.Item FORMA ACTIVĂ A VERBULUI ŞI SEMNIFICAŢIA DIATEZIALĂ ÎN LIMBA ENGLEZĂ(CEP USM, 2007) Lifari, VioricaThe topic of the article under discussion is the active form of the verb in correlation with the meaning of voice. The English language is specific in this respect as there are cases when the active form of the verb does not indicate active voice. The meaning of voice depends on the meaning of the verb as a lexical unit because its grammatical marker is „zero”. Depending on the type of the verb, the meaning of the utterance can be active, passive, reflexive and reciprocal. Besides the lexical meaning of the verb one should take into consideration the type of the noun in the syntactical function of the grammatical subject. If it is animate, we understand that the voice is acive, if it is inanimate the conclusion we should come to is that the meaning of the voice is passive, as a thing cannot be the Agent of the action.Item A CULTURAL APPROACH TO MALE-FEMALE DIFFERENCES IN COMMUNICATION(CEP USM, 2012) Lifari, VioricaThis work is an attempt to determine and analyse the differences in the speaking patterns of men and women in cross-sex and cross- ethnic communication. This topic is widely discussed nowadays as the women and men attempt to interact as equals in cross-sex conversations but they do not play the same roles in interaction. Historically men and women have different experiences and operate in different social contexts thus developing different genres of speech. At the same time women’s speeches are considered to be more emotional while men’s ones more rational. This study has a challenging character as it not only implies cross-sex conversations but it also goes further to the level of cross-ethnic dialogue. The research data include friendly dialogues between Moldovans, Russians, English and Turkish people.