Confiscarea extinsă ca pedeapsă penală. Argumente pro sau contra
| dc.contributor.author | Garaba, Mihai | ro |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-25T08:21:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-25T08:21:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Extended confiscation is an effective measure in deterring crime and ensuring compensation for victims. By applying this safety measure in the form of a punishment, the aim is not only to sanction the perpetrator, but also to recover the damage caused to society. This approach is considered necessary in the context of complex crimes and organized criminal activities. Conversely, counterarguments raise potential violations of individual rights, suggesting that extensive forfeiture might constitute excessive punishment. The actual effectiveness of this practice in crime prevention is also questioned. The duality of the arguments for and against extended forfeiture, exploring the implications of this method within contemporary criminal justice and emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to ensure respect for individual rights and to achieve the goals of justice and crime deterrence. | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | GARABA, Mihai. Confiscarea extinsă ca pedeapsă penală. Argumente pro sau contra. In: Infracţiunea - Răspunderea penală - Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie: conferinţă ştiinţifică internaţională, ediția a 3-a, 7-8 decembrie 2023. Chișinău: CEP USM, 2024, pp. 31-37. ISBN 978-9975-62-754-2. | ro |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-9975-62-754-2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12072573 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/15635 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | ||
| dc.language.iso | ro | ro |
| dc.publisher | CEP USM | en |
| dc.subject | extended confiscation | en |
| dc.subject | penalty | en |
| dc.subject | safety measure | en |
| dc.subject | offence | en |
| dc.title | Confiscarea extinsă ca pedeapsă penală. Argumente pro sau contra | ro |
| dc.type | Article | en |