Confiscarea extinsă ca pedeapsă penală. Argumente pro sau contra

Abstract

Extended confiscation is an effective measure in deterring crime and ensuring compensation for victims. By applying this safety measure in the form of a punishment, the aim is not only to sanction the perpetrator, but also to recover the damage caused to society. This approach is considered necessary in the context of complex crimes and organized criminal activities. Conversely, counterarguments raise potential violations of individual rights, suggesting that extensive forfeiture might constitute excessive punishment. The actual effectiveness of this practice in crime prevention is also questioned. The duality of the arguments for and against extended forfeiture, exploring the implications of this method within contemporary criminal justice and emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to ensure respect for individual rights and to achieve the goals of justice and crime deterrence.