Reforma textuală și metadiscursul la Eugen Ionescu și doi precursori, I. L. Caragiale și Urmuz [Articol]

Abstract

In the present study, we aim to demonstrate the interferences between the universes of the three writers, mainly the existence of a component not only common to the three but also reforming, namely their appetite for the world of the text, of the metadiscourse, which ends up surpassing the content embedded in symbols/ in signs and practically becomes a parallel, autonomous world. This textual metamorphosis, which belongs to the field of literalism, reveals, in addition to the author’s discursive abilities, a certain frailty of the author in the face of the text that sabotages him, continuously creating itself. Not coincidentally, Eugen Ionescu anticipated, in his notes, the force of the scenic techniques that will overtake the content of the play, of the literary work. Prior to this new metamorphosis, however, is the text world that originated from a Hephaestus sometimes surprised at his own creations.