UNELE ASPECTE DE DREPT COMPARAT ALE REGLEMENTARII RĂSPUNDERII PENALE PENTRU MUNCA FORŢATA

Thumbnail Image

Date

2021

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

CEP USM

Abstract

The object of this study is the analysis of the criminal legislation of several states on the regulation of forced labor. As a conclusion, there is no consensus on the regulation of forced labor in various criminal laws. In some legislation there are incriminating norms of nomen iuris type regarding forced labor (Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, Criminal Code of France, Criminal Code of Romania, Criminal Code of Azerbaijan, etc.). In other laws forced labor describes the objective side of rules that criminalize human exploitation (Criminal Code of Sweden, Criminal Code of Lithuania), or implicitly emerges from the content of norms set in sections dedicated to the protection of workers’ rights (Criminal Code of Spain). At the same time, it is found that not all states have provided criminal liability for forced labor, although in most laws, is criminalized human trafficking (trafficking in human beings / trafficking in children) for the purpose of exploitation through forced labor. At the same time, all states enshrine the right to work and prohibit forced labor through extra-criminal rules.

Description

Keywords

munca forțată, forced labor, criminal liability

Citation

GUIDEA, Petru. Unele aspecte de drept comparat ale reglementarii răspunderii penale pentru munca forțata. In: Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie, Ed. Ediția I-a, 25-26 martie 2021, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: CEP USM, 2021, Ediția I-a, pp. 404-416. ISBN 978-9975-158-12-1.

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By