Analiza comparativă a funcționării sistemului de luare a deciziilor în organele administrației de stat din țările europene și Republica Moldova [Articol]

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of decision-making systems in state administration across France, Norway, and the Republic of Moldova. It explores how citizen participation and civil society involvement strengthen democratic governance, transparency, and accountability. France represents a model of strong civic activism and institutionalized mechanisms for public engagement, while Norway demonstrates the advantages of digital governance and decentralization. The study critically evaluates the Moldovan context, identifying persistent obstacles such as limited transparency, weak institutional frameworks, and insufficient civic education. The analysis argues that Moldova requires a comprehensive reform of its participatory mechanisms, including enhanced legal frameworks, digital platforms for citizen engagement, and stronger cooperation with civil society. The article concludes by offering recommendations for adapting European best practices to the Moldovan context, with the goal of consolidating participatory democracy and fostering trust between state and society.