Facultatea de Drept / Faculty of Law
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/6
Browse
16 results
Search Results
Item UNELE NOVAȚII ÎN REGLEMENTAREA PROCEDURILOR DISCIPLINARE VIZÂND EXECUTORII JUDECĂTOREȘTI(CEP USM, 2024-11-07) Novicov, Oxana; Talmaci, RomanIt is imminent and absolutely necessary for the state, concurrently with the delegation of certain powers that are eminently its responsibility, to establish efficient and flexible control mechanisms over the exercise of the delegated powers. Starting from this objective, the legislator intervened in the framework law that regulates the activity of bailiffs. Disciplinary procedures for bailiffs have recently been subject to legislative changes. The article presents the critical analysis of some aspects related to the modification of the grounds of admissibility of the notification addressed to the Disciplinary College of bailiffs. The legal consequences of the application of the new regulations are also subject to analysis, including through the lens of the chances to continue examining referrals that do not belong to the competence of the Disciplinary Board in the competent court.Item ANALIZA COMPARATIVĂ A SISTEMELOR DE RĂSPUNDERE DISCIPLINARĂ A JUDECĂTORILOR DIN EUROPA("Print-Caro" SRL, 2022-04-22) Gavrilenco, NataliaFuncționarea democrației depinde de respectarea principiului separării puterilor publice, de respectarea principiului legalității. Traseul Republicii Moldova este orientat către integrarea europeană, ceea ce impune respectarea standardelor internaționale cu privire la independența justiției. Autorul pornește de la teza: în materia răspunderii disciplinare este foarte important să se realizeze un echilibru între necesitatea de a fi sancţionată conduita magistratului, care este incompatibilă cu exigenţele deontologice impuse acestui corp profesional, şi necesitatea de a-i fi respectată independenţa. Studiul supune analizei diverse sisteme de răspundere disciplinară a judecătorilor din Europa. În concluzie, autorul subliniază că aspectele etice ale conduitei judecătorilor trebuie discutate din diverse motive, analizând și experiența statelor europene. Astfel autorul va aborda câteva sisteme de răspundere disciplinară a judecătorilor din Europa.Item RĂSPUNDEREA DISCIPLINARĂ RAPORTATĂ LA INDEPENDENȚA JUDECĂTORULUI(CEP USM, 2022) Gavrilenco, NataliaFrom the perspective of the judge’s disciplinary liability, we emphasize the need to achieve a balance between the desire to sanction the judge and the need to respect his independence. Maintaining this balance is possible by understanding the concept of the judge’s independence by highlighting the national legal framework, as well as identifying the facts that can be treated as disciplinary violations in the activity performed by the judge.Item REGLEMENTAREA ACTIVITĂŢII JUDECĂTORILOR ŞI A EXECUTORILOR JUDECĂTOREŞTI ÎN PERIOADA MARII UNIRI(2023) Crețu, VasileProfesia de judecător şi cea de executor judecătoresc au fost într-o strânsă legătură din cele mai vechi timpuri. Analiza modului de reglementare a acestor profesii reprezintă un interes sporit pentru specialiştii în domeniul dreptului. În acest articol ne propunem să analizăm cum au fost reglementate în epoca Marii Uniri profesiile de judecător şi cea de portărel (executor judecătoresc), în special aspectele ce ţin de modul şi cerinţele de accedere în profesie, formele de răspundere disciplinară şi retribuire a muncii, drept ca bază textele actelor normative în vigoare la acea perioadă, aplicabile statutului acestor profesiuni. De asemenea, vom compara prevederile perioadei menţionate cu cele actuale, prevăzute de legislaţia în vigoare.Item EXERCITAREA ATRIBUŢIILOR ÎN SECTORUL PUBLIC ÎN SITUAŢIE DE CONFLICT DE INTERESE: ABORDĂRI DOCTRINARE PRIVIND OPORTUNITATEA DE INCRIMINARE(2024) Zaporojan, IancuThe obligation of the Republic of Moldova to establish criminal liability for the acts of exercising duties in the public sector in a conflict of interest situation does not derive from the international normative acts of reference. In art. 3261 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova the consummated conflict of interest is criminalized, not the potential conflict of interest or the real conflict of interest. Therefore, the conflict of interest that presents the highest prejudicial degree is criminalized. Moreover, the purpose of obtaining, directly or indirectly, a patrimonial advantage whose value exceeds 10,000 conventional units, which is mentioned in art. 3261 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, allows the delimitation of the criminal offense from the disciplinary offense. This value threshold is necessary and sufficient to make such a delimitation. Considering these aspects, we agree with the quasi-unanimous doctrinal opinion favoring the criminalization of acts of exercise of powers in the public sector in situations of conflict of interests.Item RĂSPUNDEREA JURIDICĂ ÎN DOMENIUL SECURITĂŢII ȘI SĂNĂTĂŢII ÎN MUNCĂ(2019) Romandaș, NicolaeIn this article, a brief research has been carried out on the matter regarding the legal liability in the field of security and health at work, taking into account the national legislation, the doctrine and the judicial practice. It has been stated that violation of security and health at work can lead to various forms of legal liability (disciplinary, material, contravention and criminal). The legal effects arising from work accidents and professional diseases, with reference to determining and paying an indemnity to the person, who lost his / her work capacity and, in case of death, to the members of the family, have been highlighted.Item REGLEMENTĂRI PRIVIND DREPTUL SALARIATULUI LA CONTESTAREA SANCȚIUNILOR DISCIPLINARE(2019) Romandaș, Nicolae; Gurin, EduardIn this article, the material regarding the right of the employee to contest the disciplinary sanctions, which constitute a constitutional right, was subjected to research. Initially, reference was made to the lawfulness of the order of application of disciplinary sanctions and the familiarization of the employee with their content. The premise of starting the appeal on the employer’s decision, the legal argument according to which the sanction order (provision, decision) can be challenged by the employee in the court under the conditions of art. 355 of the Labor Code of RM wasanalyzed. The judge may order the commencement or refusal to start the trial of the dispute, on the ground that such an act is subject to both substantive and procedural conditions established by the civil-legislation law. Reference has also been made to the role of the Labor Inspectorate, the trade union, which have more the role of negotiating and explaining labor law provisions.Item REFLECȚII CU PRIVIRE LA CONDIŢIILE RĂSPUNDERII DISCIPLINARE. SANCŢIUNEA DISCIPLINARĂ(S.C. Elan-Poligraf SRL, 2017-05-19) Romandaș, NicolaeThe article realized a research of one of the forms of juridical liability that is frequently spread in the labor legislation – the disciplinary liability. There were outlined the essential elements of the disciplinary liability making an analysis of its specific features. There was also presented the delimitation between the general and special disciplinary sanctions. There was put into discussion as well the procedure of application and execution of the disciplinary sanctions.Item RĂSPUNDEREA JUDECĂTORULUI – GARANȚIE A RESPECTĂRII ȘI APĂRĂRII DREPTURILOR OMULUI(CEP USM, 2022) Costachi, GheorgheThe article contains a brief study on the issue of the judge’s responsibility as a guarantee of the defense of human rights. Starting from the actuality of the institution of the judge’s legal responsibility in the contemporary period, the author elucidates the particularities of its understanding and the forms it involves. The focus is mostly on the value and role of the judge’s disciplinary liability, criminal liability and patrimonial liability for the effective respect and defense of human rights.Item REFLECȚII PRIVIND PRINCIPIUL PROPORȚIONALITĂȚII ȘI APLICAREA ÎN PROCEDURILE DISCIPLINARE CU PRIVIRE LA JUDECĂTORI(CEP USM, 2023) Balaban, SergiuCurrently, the principle of proportionality has attracted the attention of law school researchers, being the subject of legal debates repeatedly. The main field in which this principle has been analyzed is the field of constitutional law. However, analyzing the judicial doctrine and practice, we notice that proportionality has started to play a significant role in the procedures regarding the liability and sanctioning of judges. In this communication, we will elucidate the aspect related to the determination and observance of the principle of proportionality in the procedures regarding the liability of judges. We will refer to the application of the principle of proportionality in the case of disciplinary sanctioning of judges.