2. Articole

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/109

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.state authority

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Concepţiile moderne cu privire la aplicarea pedepsei
    (CEP USM, 2024-11-07) Ciobanu, Igor; Cotruţă, Artur; Negruţă, Ana
    Modern conceptions of punishment bring back the retributive ideas of criminal sanctions. This time, retribution no longer appears as a revenge of society against the criminal, as a brutal robbery with him, but as an equal weighing of the two factors, deed and guilt, on the one hand, and punishment, on the other. Suffering, the essence of punishment, must be met with a justly proportionate application of the punishment. Promoting modern conceptions of punishment does not mean returning to the idea of blind revenge on the part of society, to causing irrational suffering only to frighten the criminal and those around him. The idea of retribution, of recompense for the committed deed, does not mean a robbery up to the physical elimination of the perpetrator, but, in a modern vision, it means a rational reaction of society to his antisocial acts.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evoluţia istorică a reacţiei represive şi a sistemului sancţionator în Republica Moldova şi România
    (CEP USM, 2024) Ciobanu, Igor; Cotruță, Artur; Negruța, Ana
    The history of criminal law bears witness both to the continuous effort to keep under control the manifestations contrary to the social order by sanctioning the most serious forms of these manifestations, as well as to the concern for the continuous humanization of punishment. Proof of this is the very steps of the repressive reaction. The repressive reaction has taken different forms over the centuries, starting from the unlimited revenge based on the instinctive reaction, outside of any regulation, to the legally regulated reaction and strictly controlled by the state authority.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    UNITATEA PUTERII DE STAT: CONTROVERSE ŞI REALITĂŢI
    (2013) Jecev, Ion
    În prezentul articol, sunt elucidate subiecte controversate ale teoriei generale a dreptului şi dreptului constituţional. Utilizarea conceptelor teoretice şi confruntarea lor cu realităţile practice contemporane permit soluţionarea acestor divergenţe în sensul stabilirii relaţiei de compatibilitate între principiile unităţii puterii de stat şi cel al separaţiei puterilor.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    LEGITIMITATEA – CONDIŢIE OBLIGATORIE A MENŢINERII PUTERII DE STAT
    (2013) Jecev, Ion; Aramă, Elena
    Din cele expuse, putem să concluzionăm că puterea de stat nu poate fi menţinută decât în măsura în care structurile de putere sunt legitime, iar deciziile politice, inclusiv legile exprimă voinţa generală şi nu sunt folosite împotriva unei părţi a populaţiei. Iar legitimitatea unei puteri statale poate fi privită dintr-o dublă perspectivă: ca act al desemnării structurilor de putere (cucerirea sau actul de întemeiere a puterii); concordanţa dintre conţinutul deciziilor politice şi aşteptările celor guvernaţi