2. Articole
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/109
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Excluderea probelor din cauzele penale în procedurile statelor străine: analiza comparativă(CEP USM, 2024) Leontieva, SvetlanaExclusionary rules have been the subject of intense debate in the literature of recent and past years. Many studies explore in detail the characteristics of the law of evidence associated with one or more countries. Only some of them have discussed the possibility to think of a harmonize solution to the problem between countries (in Europe or outside of Europe), based on the same logic of exclusion that is shared by all. The purpose of this study is to categorise the fundamental principles of the exclusionary rules and explain the rationale behind exclusionary rules, in order to propose a collective, uniform solution to problems across Europe.Item Prezentare generală a mecanismelor juridice de eliminare a probelor în sisteme de drept comun și de drept civil(CEP USM, 2024) Leontieva, SvetlanaThis paper presents two models of eliminating of evidence that apply to common law and civil law states. The aim is to systematize the basic structures of the exclusionary rules and to identify the logic behind exclusionary rules, with a view to proposing a common uniform solution across Europe. At the same time, article analyses the mechanisms used to prevent information from becoming evidence in criminal proceedings. To carry out this research were used: the logical method, the comparative method, induction and deduction, which served to determine the common features and the determination of the common features and the regulatory measures of the rules of admissibility, the institutions of nullity and exclusion in different states. The results of this comparative review show that no single primary reason for excluding illegally obtained evidence can serve as the sole guiding principle for excluding illegally obtained evidence.