2. Articole
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/22
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item PARTICULARITĂŢILE ŞI PROBLEMELE MIŞCĂRII SINDICALE DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA(CEP USM, 2016) Nicolaescu, IrinaThis article was researched within the FP7 Program Support Marie Curie (IRSES) “Possibilities and limits, challenges and obstacles of transferring CEE EU pre-accession best practices and experience to Moldova’s and Georgia's pre-accession process”. The history of trade union movement in Moldova has over 100 years. The last two decades can be considered as the contemporary stage of development of trade unions.The characteristic of this period is the inconsistency and complexity of processes and tendencies, such as a reduction in the number and fragmentation of structures, democratization of the trade union movement, dividing and unifying their unions etc. It should be noted that trade union activities in Moldova have both traditional approach to the trade union movement, but also new activities associated with the need to address employment issues characteristic to market economies in the globalized world. On the other hand, the development of new practices and methods reflects the expansion of democracy in the country and influence on the international trade union movement. Trade unions activities aimed at solving problems that were not known (right to work and employment), search strategies appropriate to the new conditions of market relations (employer dialogue at all levels). Improved efficiency tactics used by unions contributes to potential democracy use, to promotion of dialogue within unions, to development of union movement internationally (protection and legalization of labor informal gender politics and youth), and finally, to involvement and use of science, informational resource, media in the daily practice of the unions.Item ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ В РЕСПУБЛИКЕ МОЛДОВА: ФАКТОРЫ И ОСОБЕННОСТИ ДЕМОКРАТИЧЕСКОГО ОТКАТА(2019) Талмач, АнатолийFeature of the “gray zone” is the consolidation of different types of incomplete democracy.T.Carothers highlights two distinct political syndromes, characteristic for the gray zone: “feckless pluralism” and “dominant-power politics”. The main danger of “feckless pluralism” syndrome is the complexity of getting out of this situation. With certain political freedoms, the alternation in power of different political parties or factions, democracy remains superficial. The fact of “insufficient” democracy in the Republic of Moldova shows that the country instead of genuine democratic reforms is delayed in the syndrome of “feckless pluralism”.