ANALIZA INSTITUŢIEI RESPONSABILITĂŢII LIMITATE PRIN PRISMA DIFERITELOR SISTEME DE DREPT
Date
2013
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
CEP USM
Abstract
Instituţia responsabilităţii limitate a fost introdusă în Codul penal al Republicii Moldova în 2009. Potrivit noilor
reglementări, persoana care a săvârşit o infracţiune ca urmare a unei tulburări psihice, constatate prin expertiza medicală
efectuată în modul stabilit, din cauza căreia nu-şi putea da seama pe deplin de caracterul şi legalitatea faptelor sale sau
nu le putea dirija pe deplin, este pasibilă de responsabilitate penală redusă. Responsabilitatea limitată este aplicată în
calitate de circumstanţă atenuantă în multe jurisdicţii; totuşi, problemele se referă la sarcina probaţiei şi la aprecierea
probelor în instanţă pentru partea apărării în cazul invocării responsabilităţii limitate. Scopul acestui articol este de a
evidenţia specificul responsabilităţii limitate în familiile de drept common law şi romano-germanică, precum şi de a
identifica condiţiile necesare pentru a considera această instituţie o circumstanţă atenuantă
The object of this research is the characteristics of the constituent elements ( the object of the offence; the objective side of the offence ; the subjective side of the offence; the subject of the offence) , as well as the characteristic s of the aggravating circumstantial elements of the offenses referred to art.186 PC RM . It is also explained why art.186 PC RM establishes the liability for four independent offences ( not only for one as it was considered up till now ): there is no " fundame ntal" theft part that would consist in hidden circumvention of property of another person, part that: 1) does not require the production of an effective patrimonial damage with a specific size and 2) you could graft as aggravating circumstances: a) the pro duction of an effective patrimonial damage in small proportions ; b ) the production of an effective patrimonial damage whose size is within the range of 25 - 2500 conventional units ; c) the production of an effective patrimonial damage of considerable proport ions ; d) the production of an effective patrimonial damage of large proportions; e ) the production of an effective patrimonial damage of extremely large proportions.
The object of this research is the characteristics of the constituent elements ( the object of the offence; the objective side of the offence ; the subjective side of the offence; the subject of the offence) , as well as the characteristic s of the aggravating circumstantial elements of the offenses referred to art.186 PC RM . It is also explained why art.186 PC RM establishes the liability for four independent offences ( not only for one as it was considered up till now ): there is no " fundame ntal" theft part that would consist in hidden circumvention of property of another person, part that: 1) does not require the production of an effective patrimonial damage with a specific size and 2) you could graft as aggravating circumstances: a) the pro duction of an effective patrimonial damage in small proportions ; b ) the production of an effective patrimonial damage whose size is within the range of 25 - 2500 conventional units ; c) the production of an effective patrimonial damage of considerable proport ions ; d) the production of an effective patrimonial damage of large proportions; e ) the production of an effective patrimonial damage of extremely large proportions.
Description
Keywords
responsabilitate limitată, răspundere penală, omor intenţionat, omor din imprudenţă, circumstanţe atenuante, pedeapsă, juraţi, sarcina probaţiei, limited responsibility, criminal liability, manslaughter, mitigating circumstances, burden of proof
Citation
BOLOCAN-HOLBAN, Augustina, VIDAICU, Mihaela. Analiza instituţiei responsabilităţii limitate prin prisma diferitelor sisteme de drept. În: Studia Universitatis Moldaviae. Seria ştiinţe sociale: Sociologia. Asistenţă Socială. Drept. Ştiinţe Politice. Revistă ştiinţifică. 2013, nr. 3(63), pp. 154-158. ISSN 1814-3199.