ÎNCADRAREA INFRACTIUNILOR SAVARSITE IN PARTICIPATIE: ASPECTE DISCUTABILE
Files
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Institutul Naţional al Justiţiei
Abstract
În cadrul prezentului demers ştiinţific sunt punctate unele reguli de calificare a infracţiunilor săvârşite în participaţie. Au fost evidenţiate mai multe problematici în sfera supusă analizei, printre care: aplicarea eronată, la calificare, a art. 42 CP, în condiţiile în care fapta a fost comisă în lipsa unei participaţii penale; invocarea generalistă a art. 42 CP, fără o concretizare a rolului juridic îndeplinit de făptuitor; aplicarea superfluă, la calificare, a normei prevăzută de alin.(2) art. 42 CP, în ipoteza calificării conduitei autorului; probleme la calificarea infracţiunilor săvârşite de către un grup criminal organizat; calificarea eronată potrivit semnului circumstanţial agravant „de două sau mai multe persoane” etc.
In this scientific approaches are pointed some rules for the qualification of crimes committed in participation. Several issues were highlighted in the area under analysis, including: erroneous invocation, in the qualification, of art.42 PC RM, in the conditions in which the offense was committed in the absence of a criminal participation; general invocation of art.42 PC RM, without a concretization of the legal role fulfilled by the perpetrator; superfluous retention, at qualification, of the norm provided in par.(2) art.42 PC RM, in the hypothesis of the qualification of the author’s conduct; problems with the qualification of crimes committed by an organized criminal group; erroneous qualification according to the aggravating circumstantial sign “of two or more persons” etc.
In this scientific approaches are pointed some rules for the qualification of crimes committed in participation. Several issues were highlighted in the area under analysis, including: erroneous invocation, in the qualification, of art.42 PC RM, in the conditions in which the offense was committed in the absence of a criminal participation; general invocation of art.42 PC RM, without a concretization of the legal role fulfilled by the perpetrator; superfluous retention, at qualification, of the norm provided in par.(2) art.42 PC RM, in the hypothesis of the qualification of the author’s conduct; problems with the qualification of crimes committed by an organized criminal group; erroneous qualification according to the aggravating circumstantial sign “of two or more persons” etc.
Description
Keywords
practică judiciară, criminal participation, grup criminal organizat
Citation
COPEŢCHI, Stanislav. Încadrarea infracţiunilor săvârşite în participaţie: aspecte discutabile. In: Revista Institutului Naţional al Justiţiei. 2020, nr. 4(55), pp. 35-42. ISSN 1857-2405. 10.5281/zenodo.4309075