Facultatea de Istorie şi Filosofie / Faculty of History and Philosophy

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/8

Browse

Filters

2017 - 201932020 - 20211

Settings

Start date: 2013Subject: search.filters.subject.recensământ

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    RECENSĂMÂNTUL GENERAL AL POPULAȚIEI IMPERIULUI RUS DIN ANUL 1897: PROIECȚII DEMOGRAFICE, SOCIALE, ETNO-LINGVISTICE ȘI CONFESIONALE ALE BASARABIEI
    (2018) Boțolin, Sergiu
    Studiul abordează modul de organizare și efectuare a recensământului general al populației din Imperiul Rus de la 1897. Identificarea actorilor, metodologiei și etapelor de derulare a recensământului permit elucidarea specificului acestui demers în cazul Imperiului Rus. Totodată, obiectivitatea datelor este pusă la îndoială de numărul mare de lacune constatate, atât de ordin operațional, cât și metodologic. Deficiențele recensământului general, cât și modul în care s-a încercat depășirea acestora, considerăm că sunt simptomatice pentru întreg sistemul administrativ al Imperiului Rus. Pentru Basarabia, conturarea tabloului demografic, social și etno-confesional determină locul specific al acestei gubernii în cadrul Imperiului Rus și evidențiază efectele politicilor întreprinse de centru la periferie.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    MAZILII, RUPTAŞII ŞI RUPTELE ÎN PRINCIPATUL MOLDOVEI (a doua jumătate a secolului al XVIII-lea - începutul secolului al XIX-lea)
    (2021) Tomuleț, Valentin
    Dans la présente étude, l’auteur analyse les deux catégories privilégiées de population dans la Principauté de Moldavie – les Mazilis et les Ruptaş et détermine les changements qui se sont produits au fil des ans dans le statut social et la contrainte fiscale, met en discussion les données de recensement réalisées par l’administration russe en Moldavie dans les années 1772, 1774 et 1808, qui permettent d’établir leur nombre, par rapport aux catégories sociales imposables, et à partir de là, mettre en évidence leur statut et situation économique. L’analyse des documents publiés, mais aussi des originaux des archives, mises dans le circuit scientifique par l’auteur permettent une connaissance détaillée de l’histoire des catégories sociales de la Principauté de Moldavie, en particulier de celles privilégiées, de la seconde moitié du XVIIIe siècle - le début du XIXe siècle, offre de réelles possibilités pour comprendre ces changements intervenus plus tard en Bessarabie, après son annexion en 1812 à l’Empire russe, nous permettent de souligner de manière convaincante l’unité de structure et de développement historique héritée de la Principauté de Moldavie et mettre en évidence les changements structurels qui sont parvenus au sein de ces catégories sociales et fiscales sous la domination tsariste.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    RECENSĂMINTELE ŞI STATISTICA OFICIALĂ RUSĂ – SURSE IMPORTANTE PENTRU STUDIEREA PROCESELOR DEMOGRAFICE ŞI SITUAŢIEI SOCIAL-ECONOMICE A BASARABIEI ÎN PRIMA JUMĂTATE A SECOLULUI AL XIX-LEA
    (2018) Tomuleț, Valentin
    In the present study, based on a rich factual material, the author analyzes two types of historical sources in studying of demographic and socio-economic problems of Bessarabia in the modern era - censuses (especially tax censuses) and official Russian statistics (perfected by local district / county or central / regional government institutions). The author ascertains that the historical research of the historian / researcher is based on various historical sources, on the basis of which he analyzes the question, censuses and statistics are important sources in the study of the history of Bessarabia.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    MAZILI ȘI RUPTAȘI (ȘI ALTE CATEGORII SOCIALE) ÎN STATISTICA RECENSĂMÂNTULUI POPULAȚIEI DIN 1817
    (2017) Tomuleț, Valentin
    At the time of annexation of Bessarabia to the Russian Empire, the Russian imperial institutions lacked concrete and reliable information on the number of people in the newly annexed province. The lack of statistical data for the entire province was also a problem for the regional administration, recently established in Chisinau, which for various reasons needed these data and constantly informed the imperial authorities about it. The population census became possible only in 1816-1817, when a number of concrete measures were taken in Bessarabia to establish an interim administration, to form of the first administrative and police institutions of power and some changes were made in the territorial administrative and customs and sanitary quarantine systems. In addition, the population had experienced the new regime of domination, the outflow of the population from the province to Moldova over the Prut was partially reduced, and the imperial administration was able to collect the first statistical data on the new annexed province. The results of the population census of 1817 were published in full in Russian, in 1907 by the historian I.N. Halippa, secretary of the Bessarabian Provincial Scientific Archival Committee. Subsequently, in 1920, the census was reproduced, this time in a more concise form, by Tudor Pamfile (only for the Hotin County), in 1929 – by professor of theology and history Constantin N. Tomescu, and in 1933 it was systematized by T. Porucic. The census forms contained the following components: 1. the name of districts and localities; 2. the economic situation of villages according to the category: a) good state, b) middle state (satisfactory), c) insufficient state (unsatisfactory); 3. statistics of the clergy: priests and their widows, deacons and their widows, church clerks and their widows, psalm readers and their widows, and vergers and their widows; 4. mazili and their widows; 5. ruptaşi and their widows; 6. statistics of lower social states: peasants (householders or “tax-paying householders”) and their widows, bachelors and hirelings, forgiven or scutelnici (in this category were included also “servants and servants supervisors, millers, beekeepers, foresters, shepherds and servants in households of estates owners”); 7. The total number of male households; 8. The total number of female households (widows); 9. additional information (which was not always filled in) – to whom belonged the estate of the village (the estate owner’s name), its surface according to the purpose of use – hayfield, plowing area, grassland, forests, and finally – useful buildings; sometimes we find data on old villages, which subsequently disappeared and were forgotten, and the distance between neighboring villages in versts. Statistics from 1817 attests that from the total number of 92 946 households, to mazili belonged 2370 (2.5%) households, to ruptaşi – 717 (0.8%), and to rupta de visterie and rupta de camara – 230 (0.2%) households. Most households of mazili were registered in Orhei county – 1386 (58.5%), followed by Iasi county – 464 (19.6%), Soroca county – 194 (8.2%), Hotin county – 82 (3.5 %), Bender county – 121 (5.1%), Ismail county – 74 (3.1%), Codru county – 46 (1.9), and Greceni county – 3 (0.1%) households. The Orhei County also prevailed in regard to ruptaşi: 512 (71.4%) – ruptaşi and 209 (90.9%) – rupta de visterie and rupta de camara.