Facultatea de Istorie şi Filosofie / Faculty of History and Philosophy
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/8
Browse
19 results
Search Results
Item STAGIILE DE PRACTICĂ PEDAGOGICĂ: EXPERIENŢE EUROPENE (Universitatea Aveiro, Portugalia)(CEP USM, 2012) Rotaru, Liliana; Hămuraru, MariaAutorii analizează sistemul de organizare a practicii de specialitate pentru programele de master care au drept scop pregătirea cadrelor didactice pentru învăţământul preuniversitar în Portugalia. La baza cercetărilor au stat programele de master în ştiinţele educaţiei şi experienţa Departamentului Ştiinţe ale Educaţiei din cadrul Universităţii din Aveiro, Portugalia. Este specificat faptul că, conform legislaţiei portugheze, cadrul didactic pentru învăţământul preuniversitar, indiferent de ciclu, se formează doar la Ciclul II – Master al învăţământului universitar. Cadrul legal al practicii pedagogice ghidate este reglementat în Decretul nr.43 din 22 februarie 2007 al Ministerului Educaţiei al Portugaliei. Autorii au examinat sistemul de organizare a practicii pedagogice ghidate, locul practicii în planul de învăţământ la diferite programe de master în domeniul educaţiei, numărul de credite alocate, modul de monitorizare şi evaluare a ei. Experienţa preluată în cadrul proiectului TEREC (Modernizarea formării profesionale a cadrelor didactice pentru învăţământul preuniversitar) şi practica de organizare a stagiilor pedagogice ghidate de la Universitatea din Aveiro ar putea fi utilizate pentru conceptualizareaItem BURGHEZIA BASARABEANĂ ÎN EPOCA MODERNĂ (clasificarea, caracteristica, evoluţia)(2012) Tomuleț, ValentinIn the given article the author defines the bourgeoisie as a social category linked mainly to the urban economy, which has capital and power of decision in capitalist community. The author classifies Bessarabian bourgeoisie of the nineteenth century into four categories: 1. “Economic bourgeoisie” (commercial, usurious, industrial etc.) covers, in fact, those layers that are closely linked to economic activity: the large merchants (the first and second guild), moneylenders, owners of commercial and industrial enterprises etc., which differed from each other not so much in terms of origin and the place they occupy in society, but especially in terms of interests and level of wealth. This social group was formed after the introduction of guild reform in Bessarabia according to the decision of the Governing Senate of 26 September 1830. 2. The second category consisted of state officials. Promoting a national-colonial policy in Bessarabia, tsarism based not only on the small part of local nobility that it could draw to work in various state institutions, but also on foreign element, which consisted mainly of civilian and, especially, military Russian nobility. During the first half of the nineteenth century, when there was an institutional modernization, this layer, ignored by the aristocratic elite, was evolved into the bourgeoisie, and a small part of it was actively involved in economic activities. 3. A special category was formed of people engaged in the intellectual labour, which were representatives of a wide enough range of professions: teachers of different specialities, doctors, lawyers, attorneys, engineers, etc. Characterized by different levels of wages and, respectively, different levels of wealth, this category was also varied and, like the rest, differed only by intellectual training and professional qualifi cation. 4. On the lowest level in the Bessarabian social hierarchy there was “the petty bourgeoisie” (the lower middle class), which brought together representatives of different professions - small traders (the third guild of merchants), artisans of various specialties, owners of grocery stores, inns, coffee shops, and restaurants, chemists, butchers, petty officers, etc. The rapid development of Bessarabia towards capitalism had essentially contributed to social instability of this layer, thus causing their passage up and down the social scale. An example of this is the layer of guild merchants, who were constantly moved from one guild to another and from this social category in the petty bourgeoisie. Analysing the commercial bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie, the author concludes that the peripheral situation of Bessarabia in the economic and political system of the Russian Empire has determined clearly discriminatory attitude of central authorities towards the region, which was reflected in the restriction of the rights and opportunities for local residents, mostly Moldovans, through the attraction of foreign merchants and traders from the Russian provinces, providing them with various benefi ts. As a result, the lack of state unity and national independence, political domination and economic exploitation by the Russian Empire directly influenced the genesis of bourgeoisie of Bessarabia. As a result, the bourgeoisie of Bessarabia was established as cosmopolitan social structure consisted largely of alien elements, supported and protected by the imperial administration.Item ELITE ALE BURGHEZIEI BASARABENE: NEGUSTORII ANGROSIŞTI ARMENI ŞI GRECI (1812-1868)(2012) Tomuleț, Valentin; Bivol, VictoriaIn the given article, based on the published monographic literature and unpublished archival sources, the authors make a brief description of the concept of the elite and by the examining the Armenian and Greek wholesale merchants raise the issue of the commercial elite of Bessarabia, which was formed shortly after its annexation to the Russian Empire in 1812. The authors state that the genesis and evolution of Bessarabian bourgeoisie in general, and the commercial-industrial in particular, was influenced by multiple factors, both economic and political, both internal and external. A special place in this respect belongs to the immigration of alien merchants to Bessarabia – Armenians, Greek, Jews, Bulgarians, and those from the interior provinces of Russia, many of whom settled in the province for permanent residence, filling the ranks of the commercial bourgeoisie of Bessarabia as a consequence of national-commercial policy promoted by the imperial government in the newly annexed territory. Based on the example of Armenian merchants, but also on the history of Panteleimon Sinadino – the Greek merchant of the first guild from Chisinau, whose commercial capital reached in the 1830-ies the value of 2 million rubles, the authors analyze the process of establishment of commercial bourgeoisie in Bessarabia.Item EXODUL POPULAŢIEI DIN BASARABIA ÎN MOLDOVA DE PESTE PRUT (ANII 1812-1828)(2012) Tomuleţ, ValentinQuestion regarding the exodus of the population from Bessarabia to Principality of Moldova in the first years after its annexation to the Russian Empire has not been investigated in historiography, although many historians have ascertained that exodus, but without trying to investigate problems related to emigration as a social phenomenon and, based on archival documents, to attempt to solve them. In this study the author, based on new unpublished archival documents, highlights and discusses only the most important aspects of this phenomenon: 1. presence of exodus as a social phenomenon in Bessarabia in the early years after its annexation to the Russian Empire; 2. factors that caused the exodus; 3. ways and means of population fleeing from Bessarabia over the Prut River; 4. measures taken by regional and imperial administration to stop the exodus; 5. relations between imperial and regional administration of Bessarabia and the Moldavian prince to return fugitives; 6. measures of punishment of the fugitives that were caught at the border of Bessarabia and those the Moldovan government returned to Bessarabia etc.. The author finds that the exodus of population from Bessarabia to the right side of the Prut is explained by the extremely depressed state of the population, caused by Russian military occupation in previous years, especially during the Russian-Turkish wars of 1806-1812, 1828-1829, by economic ruin of the peasants, the overgrowth of taxes and by the fact that this population had lost confidence in local and regional administration to assuage their sufferings.Item INVESTIGAŢIILE ARHEOLOGICE LA SITUL SAHARNA MARE (2009-2011) (I)(2012) Niculiţă, Ion; Zanoci, Aurel; Băţ, Mihail; Matveev, SergiuThe Saharna Mare site (Rezina district) stands out among the monuments of the Middle Dniester area by its location and the degree of scrutiny. It is situated on a high rocky trapezoidal cape with an area of about 12 hectares, surrounded on three sides by deep canyons with inaccessible shores. Only from the south the cape is connected to the outside world. Due to its strategic location, this area was inhabited as early as the end of the 2nd millennium B.C. This monument drew the attention in the late 40s of the last century when there were conducted the first archaeological excavations (Smirnov, 1949, 93-96; Smirnov, 1949a, 189-202; Arnăut 2000, 93-104). Since 2001, an archaeological expedition of the Moldova State University conducts systematic research on the site. The results of studies conducted in 2001-2007 have been published in several articles and a monograph (Niculiţă, Zanoci, Arnăut 2008a, 69-150). As a result of these investigations there were identified several cultural-chronological horizons: 1 - presented by complexes with incised pottery; 2 - relating to the Cozia-Saharna culture; 3 - Thracian-Getae (7th - 3rd centuries B.C.). This article contains information about finds relating to the Cozia-Saharna culture, which were discovered as a result of the excavations of 2009-2011 carried out by five digs (13, 13A, 14, 15, 18) with the total area of 444 m2. Through the matching of orthophotomaps (fi g. 4/1), the results of geomagnetic studies (fi g. 3, 4/2), and archaeological research data (fi g. 9/1) in the southeast of the cape there were found the remains of a “citadel” and the adjacent “fortifi ed yard”. The “citadel” of a rounded shape (fig. 4/3), size 60×64 m (about 0,32 ha), was located on the southeastern outskirts of the cape; it was reinforced on all sides by a moat and a wooden stone-earthen wall. The width of the moat varies from 4,2 to 6,0 m, depth – 0,7 to 1,6 m. The wall was built of two rows of wooden pillars dug vertically into the mainland loam. The space between rows was fi lled with stones and earth, thus forming a fortification of about 1,0-1,2 m in width. The “citadel” had an adjacent semi-oval “yard” in the north-west side, with the dimensions of 55×78 m, which was also fortified by a moat (fig. 4/3). The width of the moat was 2-3 m, the depth – 1,0-1,4 m. In the “citadel” there were investigated one ground construction (fi g. 21), 37 household pits (fi g. 23-32), and one religious construction? (fi g. 33). There was also identifi ed a sufficiently rich and varied inventory (fig. 36-45) that allowed to attribute the “citadel” and the adjacent “yard” to the Cozia-Saharna culture. Most likely, these fortifications were designed to shelter residents of the Saharna “Dealul Mănăstirii” settlement, which was in close proximity. In addition, the “citadel” could serve as a socio-political and religious center for the Early Hallstatt population of the Saharna region (fi g. 46).Item ÎNLĂTURAREA DE PE PIAŢA INTERNĂ DIN BASARABIA A MONEDELOR TURCEŞTI ŞI AUSTRIECE ŞI ÎNLOCUIREA LOR CU ASIGNATUL RUSESC(CEP USM, 2012) Tomuleţ, ValentinItem BANII – MIJLOC DE RĂSPÂNDIRE A BOLILOR INFECŢIOASE ŞI A EPIDEMIILOR(CEP USM, 2012) Arapu, ValentinItem EFIGII FEMININE PE MONEDELE ROMANE DESCOPERITE ÎN SPAŢIUL DINTRE PRUT ŞI NISTRU(CEP USM, 2012) Ciobanu, Larisa