Facultatea de Istorie şi Filosofie / Faculty of History and Philosophy

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/8

Browse

Filters

20242

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Гончарова, КсенияSubject: search.filters.subject.identity

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ИСТОРИЯ ПОНЯТИЙ КАК МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ ИЗУЧЕНИЯ КОНЦЕПТА «ИДЕНТИЧНОСТЬ»
    (CEP USM, 2024) Гончарова, Ксения
    The paper aims to justify the necessity of studying the concept of «identity» in contrast to the criticism of the term in contemporary academic literature. The methodological basis for solving this problem is conceptual history by Germann Lübbe. Viewing the concept of «identity» through Lübbe’s methodological lens allows us to identify the reasons for the identity theory to turn to the history of concepts, resolve the difficulties that arise when they are combined, outline the general understanding of identity that emerges from studying it through the history of concepts, and also to map out the trajectory for further research. Thus, the paper emphasizes the importance and relevance of «identity» in contemporary scholarly discourse.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ФИЛОСОФСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ АНТРОПОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ПОДХОДА К ИЗУЧЕНИЮ ИДЕНТИЧНОСТИ
    (CEP USM, 2024) Гончарова, Ксения
    The article aims to provide a philosophical analysis of the anthropological approach to the identity study. Through the application of diachronic analysis and content analysis to the works of anthropologists who are theorists of identity, we have highlighted various historical, methodological, and philosophical aspects of the topic. These aspects include the history of the conceptualization of the term «identity» in anthropology, the correlation between the concepts of «identity» and «character», the analytical significance of the «identity» concept in anthropological works, and the methodological foundations of the anthropological understanding of identity. The result of the philosophical analysis is the identification of both the advantages and disadvantages of the anthropological approach to the identity study. On one hand, it emphasizes the significance of material and cultural aspects of human existence and highlights the distinction between the practical use of «identity» and its theoretical understanding within the academic community. On the other hand, it tends to reduce the individual to the collective.