Facultatea de Drept / Faculty of Law

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/6

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.judicial system

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    OBIECTUL ÎNCREDERII PUBLICE ÎN INSTANȚE JUDECĂTOREȘTI. DELIMITĂRI CONCEPTUALE
    (CEP USM, 2024-11-07) Milicenco, Ștefan
    The goal of this study is to establish the conceptual delimitations regarding the object of public confidence in the judiciary. In accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the courts in a democratic society must inspire confidence in the public. The measurement of public confidence in the judiciary has become common practice in the Republic of Moldova. However, there is no common ground on the terms used in surveys to express the object of assessed confidence: the terms „justice” and „judiciary” seem to be used interchangeably. The paper argues that precision is of paramount importance, as ambiguous wording can affect the quality of collected data and subsequent conclusions. Also, the paper proposes the most suitable term in this respect.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    JURISPRUDENȚA CA IZVOR DE DREPT: DILEME NORMATIVE ȘI DOCTRINARE
    (CEP USM, 2024) Butucea, Eugen
    The article contains a study of the place and value of case law in the system of sources of law. As a result of the analysis of several doctrinal opinions, the author argues that case law is not a source of law, it is an important source of uniform interpretation of law by the judiciary in the context of the dispensation of justice.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ABORDAREA CONTRAVENȚIILOR ÎN SITUAȚII EXCEPȚIONALE GENERATE DE PANDEMIA COVID-19
    (CEP USM, 2021-12-08) Mangîr, Vlada; Pantea, Oleg
    The COVID-19 pandemic has put its trademark on the 21st century, not only due to the impact it had made on the economic, social and justice sectors, barring the overlap with the digital era. The already developing digitalization process that has started ever since the early 90’s has faced a major turbulence, with the new virus allowing the experts to broaden their perspective on how to use technology to the best interest of the collective, in order to keep the communities safe. This key factor has highlighted that the pandemic has rather stimulated the development of the digital current, mirroring a symbiotic cau- se-effect relationship between the two. This being said, digitalization has been appointed as a pivotal means of governance. The increased contraventions and the ignorance of the judicial system to the pandemic waves, has reflected the mandatory update of the digital tools in our era for catalyzing cyber justice.