The object of this investigation is the four draft decisions issued to amend and complete the Supreme Court of Justice’s Plenary Decision no.20 from 08.07.1999, the Supreme Court of Justice’s Plenary Decision no.23 from 29.10.2001, the
Supreme Court of Justice’s Plenary Decision no.16 from 07.11.2005 and the Supreme Court of Justice’s Plenary Decision no.4 from 19.06.2006. These decisions highlight the interpretation of art.189, art.236, art.264, art.2641, art.265, art.266
and of art.287 PC RM. As a result of this analysis, there are recommended practical solutions to improve the draft decisions mentioned above. The recommendations purpose is to make the application of art.189, art.236, art.264, art.2641,
art.265, art.266 and of art.287 PC RM more efficient and standardized
