Facultatea de Drept / Faculty of Law

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/6

Browse

Filters

20172

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Obadă, DumitruSubject: search.filters.subject.prosecutor

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reconceptualizarea funcţiei procurorului de supraveghere a activităţii speciale de investigaţie
    (2017) Obadă, Dumitru
    Lucrarea reprezintă analiza cadrului legal al Republicii Moldova care vizează reglementarea activităţii speciale de investigaţii din perspectiva competenţelor funcţionale ale subiecţilor învestiţi de legiuitor cu atribuţii de supraveghere a măsurilor speciale de investigaţie. De asemenea, s-au evidenţiat incoerenţele normative specificate în conţinutul regulatoriu al legii procesual penale, inclusiv analiza coroborată a normelor juridice care se conţin în Codul de procedură penală, precum şi alte reglementări ce vizează acest domeniu specific de activitate statală, stabilite în legislaţia conexă. Autorul a arătat efectele juridice nefaste ce pot fi generate de interpretarea şi aplicarea eronată a normelor juridice aferente activităţii speciale de investigaţii. Pe durata realizării prezentului studiu s-a ţinut cont de aplicarea legii de către organele statului la desfăşurarea investigaţiilor penale, inclusiv s-a statuat în privinţa clarificării şi definitivării conceptului de „supraveghere a activităţii speciale de investigaţie”.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Theoretical and practical implications on the subjects charged with duties of conducting special investigation activity
    (2017) Obadă, Dumitru
    This paper is an endeavor to analyze Moldova’s legal framework aimed at regulating Special investigative activity (SIA) in terms of subjects or, in other words, of procedural exponents, invested by a legislator with duties of carrying out SIM. It is also an attempt to reveal the normative inconsistencies specified in the regulatory content of the Criminal Procedural Law, including a verifiable analysis of the legal norms stipulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure, as well as other regulations related to this specific area of state activity specified in the related legislation. Moreover, the author sought to highlight the adverse legal effects that may be generated by the misinterpretation and misapplication of the legal norms related to SIA. While carrying out this study, we have taken into account the practice of law enforcement by state bodies in conducting criminal investigations, as well as the attempt to clarify and define the concept of “carrying out special investigative activity”. The research is also an attempt to clarify the competences of procedural subjects in charge of conducting SIA, as well as their functional interdependence in this activity. Furthermore, the study reasons upon some author’s assertions regarding the legal nature of SIM results from the perspective of the theory of evidence, particularly the admissibility of evidence obtained through SIM, the procedural stage at which the SIM can be performed, the impact of the current normative inadvertences regarding the possibility of taking evidence by means of SIM. The research has also been focused on identifying the prosecutor’s functional characteristics in conducting special investigative activity.