The general findings of the present paper refer to the fact that the overall activity of the judicial inspection body is confidential. However, there are also transparent activities, due to the necessity of alignment of the judicial inspection body to the policies of good judicial self-government, that presuppose the openness of public authorities, including the Judicial Authority, towards the society. Thus, the competencies of the judicial inspection body should be exercised in a manner that ensures the balance between confidentiality and transparency, in order to protect the independence and the reputation of judges, as well as the public interest, as an immanent element of the public confidence in the Judiciary.
