Facultatea de Drept / Faculty of Law

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/6

Browse

Filters

2018 - 20204

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Creciun, NataliaSubject: search.filters.subject.Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    EXCLUDEREA DREPTULUI JUDECĂTORILOR ÎN FUNCȚIE DE A ACCEDE ÎN INSPECȚIA JUDICIARĂ – MIJLOC DE SOLUȚIONARE A CONFLICTELOR DE INTERESE SAU SUBMINAREA ESENȚEI AUTOADMINISTRĂRII JUDECĂTOREȘTI
    (CEP USM, 2020) Creciun, Natalia
    The present communication is based on the appreciation of the quality and efficiency of national legal norms, according to whom the person who intends to candidate for the position of inspector in the Judicial Inspection within the Superior Council of Magistracy must have not exercised the function of judge during the last 3 years. Such a restriction contravenes the European standards on the composition of bodies with particular competencies in disciplinary investigations against judges and undermines the essence of judicial self-governance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    PARTICULAR FORMS OF EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF JUDGES: BETWEEN EXIGENCY OF A CONSOLIDATED JUSTICE AND VIOLATION OF JUSTICE INDEPENDENCE
    (Institutul Naţional al Justiţiei, 2019) Creciun, Natalia
    The issue analyzed in the present paper refers to the fact if judges must be verified and/or assessed in their activity. In case of affirmative answer, we have to establish exigencies demanded for these verifications and/or assessments, to ensure the balance between the protection of public interest and judges’ private life. We emphasize the necessity to respect both the principle of separation and collaboration of powers and the independence of judges as individuals and of the Judiciary as a hole. We propose to develop within the Judicial Authority efficient mechanisms of intervention in the field of verification of office-holders (referring to judges and candidates for the position of judge) and in the field of assessment the professional integrity of judges. Simultaneously, we argue the indispensability of collaboration, in particular conditions, between the representatives of the Judiciary (The Superior Council of Magistracy, The Judicial Inspection) and the representatives of the executive power (The National Anticorruption Center, The Security and Intelligence Service, The National Integrity Authority), in order to exercise complex and qualitative verifications and/or assessments, avoiding threats to independence and the impartiality of magistrates.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    LA PROTECTION JURIDIQUE DES JUGES POURSUIVIS PENALEMENT PAR DES MECANISMES D’AUTOGOUVERNEMENT JUDICIAIRE
    (Institutul Naţional al Justiţiei, 2020) Creciun, Natalia
    Prezenta lucrare cuprinde analiza cadrului normativjuridic național privind instituția răspunderii penale a judecătorilor, cu accent pe etapa prealabilă pornirii urmăririi penale și etapa incipientă a urmăririi penale. Este sintetizată valoarea autoadministrării judecătorești – a Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii și a Inspecției Judiciare - în procedura examinării demersurilor Procurorului General privind pornirea urmăririi penale sau efectuarea unor acțiuni specifice de urmărire penală (reținere, aducere silită, percheziție, arestare) în privința judecătorilor. Cercetarea este axată pe identificarea mecanismelor de care dispun organele de autoadministrare judecătorească în vederea protejării juridice a judecătorilor urmăriți penal, fiind argumentată necesitatea recunoașterii unor garanții suplimentare acestei categorii de profesioniști, datorită statutului lor specific, comparativ cu cel al altor subiecți de drept.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item