Facultatea de Drept / Faculty of Law

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/6

Browse

Filters

20203

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Coban, IgorSubject: search.filters.subject.executarea silită

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    PERSPECTIVELE LICITAȚIEI ELECTRONICE ȘI PARTICULARITĂȚILE CONTESTĂRII
    (CEP USM, 2020) Coban, Igor; Cotorobai, Radu
    Forced execution is one of the fundamental institutions of civil procedure and an important component of justice in a state ruled by the rule of law. In the absence of coherent, clear, flexible and rapid enforcement procedures that guarantee the effective execution of the enforceable title, the party would be unable to enjoy the process, thus giving the creditor only theoretical and illusory rights. Thus, one of the possibilities to achieve these desires is to create the technical and normative conditions for the sale of the seized goods during the forced execution at the electronic auctions organized in the Internal network in live regime. Topic we have addressed in this paper. In order to illustrate the most important advantages of the electronic auction over the classical auction and to analyze the most relevant examples of good practices in this regard.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    EXAMINAREA CONTESTAȚIEI LA EXECUTARE: ÎN LIPSA SAU CU PREZENȚA PARTICIPANȚILOR LA PROCES
    (CEP USM, 2020) Coban, Igor
    With the entry into force of Law no. 17/2018, art. 269 para. (4) of the CCP has established (I) the general rule according to which the cases related to the enforcement procedure - are examined individually, without summoning the participants to the trial; and (II) the exception from this rule, according to which - in cases where the judge considers the presence of the participants at the trial to be necessary, he / she shall cite them accordingly. Therefore, considering that the involvement of the court in the forced execution procedure takes several forms and roles, such as: the exercise of attributions characteristic to an enforcement body, the resolution of incidents that occurred during the execution procedure or the control of the legality of the acts, the actions and / or inactions of the judicial executor (the complaint on execution), and, that the rule and the exception provided in art. 269 para. (4) CCP has an excessive general character. In this study we set out to analyze the situations in which the court could or should make use of the exception in the cases regarding the examination of the complaint on execution.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    IMPLICAREA INSTANȚEI DE JUDECATĂ ÎN EXECUTAREA SILITĂ: NOTE DE CURS
    (CEP USM, 2020) Coban, Igor
    Scopul activității judiciare nu se poate limita doar la obținerea unei hotărâri judecătorești favorabile. Simpla recunoaștere a dreptului sau obligarea debitorului de a restabili dreptul încălcat ori contestat nu este, de multe ori, suficientă. Hotărârea judecătorească prin ea însăși, chiar înzestrată cu autoritate de lucru judecat, „ riscă să rămână o lovitură de sabie în apă și să nu servească cu nimic părții victorioase, în special reclamantului, dacă el n-ar putea recurge la constrângere pentru a o executa”.