Browsing by Author "Guidea, Petru"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

ANALIZA MATERIALELOR ȘTIINȚIFICE PRIVIND RĂSPUNDEREA PENALĂ PENTRU MUNCA FORȚATĂ
(CEP USM, 2024) Guidea, Petru
In this article, in a chronological sequence, the main doctrinal sources from the Republic of Moldova are analyzed, in which the offense of forced labor (art. 168 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova) is analyzed. The analysis shows that the doctrinaires pay attention to the constitutive elements and the aggravating circumstances of the offense in question. In particular, the following are analyzed: the generic juridical object; special juridical object; material object; victim; the structure and content of the prejudicial act; moment of consumption; the form of guilt and the type of intention; the motive of the offense; the qualities of the subject of the offense. Also, the criteria for delimiting the offense of forced labor in relation to other offenses are examined (in particular, to the crimes provided by the art. 165, 1651, 167 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova). There are studied international and national normative acts that contain reference provisions for art. 168 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Contradictions and divergences between different doctrinal points of view are highlighted.
ANALIZA MATERIALELOR ȘTIINȚIFICE PRIVIND RĂSPUNDEREA PENALĂ PENTRU MUNCA FORȚATĂ, PUBLICATE ÎN STRĂINĂTATE
(CEP USM, 2024) Botnarenco, Mihaela; Guidea, Petru
Pentru a percepe natura juridică a infracţiunii de muncă forțată, pot fi luate în considerare cercetările realizate de către: C.-E. Cristea, C. Olaru și I. Ristea (România); M. D. Jdan, T. O. Mihailicenko, A. Orlean, O. O. Oropai și Iu. Iu. Zabuga (Ucraina); A. V. Andreev, I. T. Idrisov, N. T. Idrisov și N. Iu. Tetereatnikov (Federația Rusă). La delimitarea muncii forțate de faptele asemănătoare (sclavie, traficul de ființe umane săvârșit în scopul exploatării prin muncă etc.) se referă: I. T. Idrisov, N. T. Idrisov, T. O. Mihailicenko, A. Orlean și Iu.Iu. Zabuga. Pentru a identifica înțelesul noțiunii de muncă forțată, este util să luăm în considerare definițiile acestei noțiuni, care sunt formulate de către C.-E. Cristea, I. T. Idrisov, N. T. Idrisov, T. O. Mihailicenko și Iu.Iu. Zabuga.
LATURA SUBIECTIVĂ A INFRACȚIUNII PREVĂZUTE LA ART.168 CP RM
(CEP USM, 2022) Guidea, Petru
This article is dedicated to the analysis of the subjective side of the crime of forced labor through the prism of the signs that characterize it: guilt, purpose, reason. Among other things, it is argued that the crime of forced labor is usually committed with direct intent. Only in the case described in letter b) paragraph (3) art.168 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, the perpetrator manifests intent towards the prejudicial act and imprudence towards the prejudicial consequences. The purpose of the crime is not a mandatory sign of the subjective side of the crime of forced labor. As a rule, the reason for the crime is not relevant to the classification of the crime of forced labor, with the exception of the hypothesis described in paragraph (2) letter e) art.168 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, which establishes the aggravation of responsibility for the commission of the crime for reasons of prejudice - case in which, the reason for the crime constitutes a mandatory sign of the subjective side of the examined crime.
UNELE ASPECTE DE DREPT COMPARAT ALE REGLEMENTARII RĂSPUNDERII PENALE PENTRU MUNCA FORŢATA
(CEP USM, 2021) Guidea, Petru
The object of this study is the analysis of the criminal legislation of several states on the regulation of forced labor. As a conclusion, there is no consensus on the regulation of forced labor in various criminal laws. In some legislation there are incriminating norms of nomen iuris type regarding forced labor (Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, Criminal Code of France, Criminal Code of Romania, Criminal Code of Azerbaijan, etc.). In other laws forced labor describes the objective side of rules that criminalize human exploitation (Criminal Code of Sweden, Criminal Code of Lithuania), or implicitly emerges from the content of norms set in sections dedicated to the protection of workers’ rights (Criminal Code of Spain). At the same time, it is found that not all states have provided criminal liability for forced labor, although in most laws, is criminalized human trafficking (trafficking in human beings / trafficking in children) for the purpose of exploitation through forced labor. At the same time, all states enshrine the right to work and prohibit forced labor through extra-criminal rules.
UNELE CONSIDERAŢII ASUPRA PRACTICII APLICĂRII RĂSPUNDERII PENALE PENTRU MUNCA FORŢATĂ (art.168 CP RM)
(CEP USM, 2021) Guidea, Petru
In this article is analyzed the case law of the crime provided in art.168 of the Criminal Code of Republic of Moldova. In particular, it is dedicated to the criminal law problems in the practice of enforcing the crime of forced labor. As a result of the empirical study, the conclusion is reached about the erroneous judicial practice of framing the actions of the perpetrator according to letter a) paragraph (2) art.168 CC RM. We also established that in practice it is often omitted to specify the intensity of violence applied in the context of coercion – a situation that may lead to questioning the legality of the qualification solution.