Vizdoagă, TatianaPetrușca, Sergiu2024-05-242024-05-242018-05-04VIZDOAGĂ, Tatiana și Sergiu PETRUŞCA. Rolul procurorului și a conducătorului organului de urmărire penală la formarea convingerii intime a ofițerului de urmărire penală. In: Promovarea valorilor sociale în contextul integrării Europene: conferință științifică, 04 mai 2018, Chişinău. Tipografia "Adrilang" SRL, 2018, pp. 37-43.978-9975-3185-7-0https://msuir.usm.md/handle/123456789/15272For achieving an objective of the legal process: analysis of the criminal contempt officer actions in the criminal investigation as well as interference in his actions by criminal contempt supervisor and prosecutor is a subject for search in the following instance. Especially practical and theoretical aspects of the criminal contempt officer’s independence were presented for the appraisal and stock of the criminal process’s evidence. Also his own responsibility for legal proceedings conducted, interference of the prosecutor and the criminal contempt supervisor as a legal guarantee of the basic human rights, provided by criminal procedure law and European Convention of Human Rights. From the perspective of prevention and respect of the human rights. Proposal for adjustment of the criminal law.roofițer de urmărire penalăsupraveghereprocurorconducătorul organului de urmărire penalăindependențaresposabilitateaconvingereprobeprobatoriuRolul procurorului și a conducătorului organului de urmărire penală la formarea convingerii intime a ofițerului de urmărire penalăROLE OF THE PROSECUTOR AND THE CRIMINAL CONTEMPT SUPERVISOR IN ASCERTAINMENT OF THE INDIVIDUAL OFFENCE OF THE CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OFFICERArticle